Independent health research notes · Education only · Not medical advice
Peptide reference tool · Education only

A safer peptide comparison table for the viral “dosing cheat sheet” era.

The TikTok version centered dose ranges. This Glow Diary resource rewrites the idea as a standalone comparison tool: what each peptide is usually claimed to do, how strong the evidence looks, and which questions belong with a licensed clinician.

Not a protocol. This page intentionally does not provide dose ranges, syringe units, mixing instructions, vendor guidance, or personalized recommendations. Use it to prepare better questions, not to self-administer peptides.
Editorial peptide research visual with source notes and muted botanical science elements
Research-first, not protocol-first: claims are translated into evidence questions.
How this fits the site

From social chart to research-first resource.

The original infographic grouped BPC-157, KPV, MOTS-c, GHK-Cu, NAD+, and SS-31 around claimed benefits and dosing. The Glow Diary version fits into the peptide hub, doctor-question checklist, and evidence library by changing the job: compare claims, label evidence maturity, and route risky decisions back to clinical care.

Abstract comparison panel representing evidence, access, and safety signals Use this page to
  • Separate “what people claim” from “what is proven.”
  • Spot research-use or investigational language.
  • Build clinician questions before buying, injecting, stacking, or copying a protocol.
01

Comparison table

Claims · evidence · questions

Peptide Common online claim Evidence status Glow Diary interpretation Questions to ask
BPC-157 Body Protection Compound 157 Tissue-repair / gut-healing marketing Often framed online for gut irritation, digestion, inflammation, and soft-tissue recovery. Research peptide / limited human outcome evidence The useful reader move is to ask whether a clinician is discussing an approved therapy, an investigational protocol, or a research-use product. Do not treat protocol charts as dosing instructions.
  • What human data supports this specific outcome?
  • Is the product intended for human use and from a regulated source?
  • What symptoms would make this inappropriate or urgent?
KPV Lysine–proline–valine Inflammation / gut-barrier marketing Typically promoted for calming gut irritation, bloating, immune balance, and inflammation. Mechanism-heavy / consumer evidence remains thin KPV belongs in the inflammation-and-gut-hype bucket until a specific product, indication, route, and human evidence base are named.
  • Is this being used for a diagnosed condition or a wellness claim?
  • What evidence is human clinical evidence versus animal or cell work?
  • What monitoring or stop rules would apply?
MOTS-c Mitochondrial-derived peptide Energy / metabolism / exercise-mimetic marketing Often described as supporting energy, metabolism, insulin sensitivity, body composition, and endurance. Interesting mitochondrial biology / limited consumer-ready clinical proof MOTS-c is worth watching, but mechanism language should not become a promise that an injection substitutes for exercise, nutrition, or clinician-managed metabolic care.
  • Which endpoint is being claimed: energy, glucose, fat loss, or exercise capacity?
  • Was that endpoint tested in humans?
  • Could current medications or metabolic conditions change the risk picture?
GHK-Cu Copper peptide Skin / hair / tissue-remodeling marketing Usually marketed for skin repair, collagen support, hair support, wrinkles, and appearance-focused aging claims. Plausible skin biology / broad longevity claims need caution GHK-Cu has a more credible skin-biology story than most broad anti-aging claims, but gene-expression or collagen language is not the same as proven injectable longevity outcomes.
  • Is the goal skin appearance, wound care, hair, or systemic longevity?
  • What route and product quality are being discussed?
  • Are there better-studied dermatology options for this goal?
NAD+ Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide Cellular energy / longevity-clinic marketing Commonly promoted for cellular energy, DNA repair, brain function, metabolism, and longevity support. Biology is real / clinic-protocol claims vary widely NAD+ is a molecule involved in cellular metabolism, but that does not validate every IV, injection, supplement, or anti-aging package sold around it.
  • What product and route are being proposed?
  • What outcome will be measured, and over what timeline?
  • What are the risks, interactions, cost, and alternatives?
SS-31 Mitochondrial-targeted peptide also known as elamipretide in research contexts Mitochondrial support / oxidative-stress marketing Often framed for energy, mitochondrial support, oxidative-stress reduction, and cellular health. Investigational context matters / not a generic wellness shortcut SS-31 should be handled as a specific investigational or clinical-research topic, not as a copy-paste anti-aging protocol from a chart.
  • Is there an approved indication or a trial context?
  • What condition is being treated or studied?
  • What adverse-event and monitoring plan exists?
02

Quick cards

Saveable summaries

Abstract peptide research desk with soft green editorial lighting Tissue-repair / gut-healing marketing

BPC-157

The useful reader move is to ask whether a clinician is discussing an approved therapy, an investigational protocol, or a research-use product. Do not treat protocol charts as dosing instructions.

Source note

Prompted by a TikTok photo post from @beautybyerikany labeled “Peptide dosing cheat sheet.” The table above is a rewritten editorial resource, not a copy of the dosing chart.

View the original TikTok source

Research next step

For any peptide on this page, check PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA labels, and the exact product source before treating a mechanism claim as human evidence.

Open the medical sources library